|
-
Originally Posted by donkey22
What utter tosh. How exactly do you propose they reach Rwanda via the U.K. without having to pay people smugglers?
Yes, your right it's tosh.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
-
Originally Posted by local
Yes, your right it's tosh.
Do try and engage your brain before typing in the future.
It does get rather tiresome trying to make sense of your ill educated gobbledygook.
Last edited by donkey22; 18/04/2022 at 07:09 PM.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
But they are not supposed to leave a safe country to come to the Uk whatever their grounds for asylum and they must have leave to enter before they arrive in the UK so if they appear here ad hoc illegally now they will be on the way to Rwanda to be processed. When they are processed here they are looked after for years and SOME are denied asylum and asked to leave so they just pack up and run to the next town and you can’t do this in a third country processing facility.
So in effect they will be paying the people smugglers for an indirect ticket to Rwanda, or they could stay in the safety of a safe country like the rules require .
Local this is correct ..
Those who knowingly enter the UK without permission or overstay are guilty of a criminal offence (see Section 24 the Immigration Act 1971)*
So at some point the "illegals" would have to gain permission or leave during their boat crossing.
Or preferably before … and leave to enter / remain / work or study can only be granted from a British embassy in their country .
Yea you can say it’s wrong but it’s not .
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by Lamparilla
I had a self-imposed absence from the forum for a few months, mainly because I was fed up arguing with racists who think they aren't racists.
It seems now that even the most unlikely ones are coming out of the woodwork.
Ha! There's obviously a few pertinent threads that you've not read. There's nothing in this thread that The PNP hasn't said previously.
It's perfectly possible to be a Remainer and dislike foreigners.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by Desert Region
Ha! There's obviously a few pertinent threads that you've not read. There's nothing in this thread that The PNP hasn't said previously.
It's perfectly possible to be a Remainer and dislike foreigners.
There's a big difference between 'disliking foreigners' (myself, I don't 'dislike' any nationality) and disliking all-and-sundry migrants getting into the UK who have no right to enter.....
On Yer Bike!
www.20splentyforus.co.uk
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by The PNP
There's a big difference between 'disliking foreigners' (myself, I don't 'dislike' any nationality) and disliking all-and-sundry migrants getting into the UK who have no right to enter.....
A correction then:
* Dislike certain foreigners.
I assume you don't object to the word "dislike"? That idea of machine gunning refugees seems to thus suggest that dislike isn't too strong a term.
I think people can't get their heads around a Remainer disliking any foreigners. The simple logic seems to run: Brexiteer = racist, xenophobe, Gammon, etc.; Remainer = enlightened, progressive soul and good person who is on the right side of history, etc.
I mean, for crying out loud, man: where's your post-colonial guilt?!
Should you not be paying for the sins of your ancestors?!
Alikado will be very disappointed in you.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
In all of this discussion on Rwanda it should not be forgotten that Farnce is the problem.
If they took back the "leakage" from their borders no one would be considering anyone else
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
"France is the problem"?????????
Gob-smacking.
Your capacity for trying to divert blame is staggering.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by bensherman
"France is the problem"?????????
Gob-smacking.
Your capacity for trying to divert blame is staggering.
Yes that's right France, if they controlled their borders and took back the people who push off in boats, and arrested the smugglers there would be no discussion and no one dying in the channel.
That's right it's Frances's problem that we have to fix.
We even offered to Police their border for them, they refused.
We offered our technology to help them police their border, they refused.
If Macron hadn't got an election due there might have been an agreement.
The same Macron who accused us of relying on illegal Labour yet he could stop it and refused.
The French Officers pulled on their Gauloises as the boats pushed off with the migrants possibly going to their deaths.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Styx liked this post
-
Originally Posted by local
The French Officers pulled on their Gauloises as the boats pushed off with the migrants possibly going to their deaths.
Odd thing is, I don't remember anything like the numbers of migrants getting from France to UK, by whatever means, whilst we were members of the EU!
On Yer Bike!
www.20splentyforus.co.uk
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by MICK/GILLY
But they are not supposed to leave a safe country to come to the Uk
Yes they can, they can claim asylum anywhere they choose. You might not want them to but they can.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by salus.populi
Yes they can, they can claim asylum anywhere they choose. You might not want them to but they can.
I might not want them to risk their lives and their children's lives leaving a safe country and appearing without leave to enter by chancing it crossing the watery graveyard that the channel has become only to be sent off to Rwanda .
“Yea you can say it’s wrong but it’s not”.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by MICK/GILLY
I might not want them to risk their lives and their children's lives leaving a safe country and appearing without leave to enter by chancing it crossing the watery graveyard that the channel has become only to be sent off to Rwanda .
“Yea you can say it’s wrong but it’s not”.
Then the UK must offer safe legal routes to the UK for them.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
I am all for legal immigration
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
|
Search Qlocal (powered by google)
Privacy & Cookie Policy
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Booking.com
Supporting Local Business
Be Seen - Advertise on Qlocal
UK, Local Online News Community, Forums, Chats, For Sale, Classified, Offers, Vouchers, Events, Motors Sale, Property For Sale Rent, Jobs, Hotels, Taxi, Restaurants, Pubs, Clubs, Pictures, Sports, Charities, Lost Found
UK,
UK News,
|