-
Climate change
It's hardly a surprise to find this charmless git involved
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...climate-crisis
Among other things the key scientist quoted suggested IN 2013 that the earth would start cooling in the next 10-15 years
How's that going then?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
-
Interesting to note that Southport’s very own Damien Moore is amongst the 20 other climate deniers.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
bensherman
Well we've had nearly nine of those years and there are still six to go, so he could be right. Scientists don't have to have charm.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
carliol
Well we've had nearly nine of those years and there are still six to go, so he could be right. Scientists don't have to have charm.
He’s in the minority 3%.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) What We Know site states: "Based on the evidence, about 97 percent of climate scientists agree that human-caused climate change is happening."
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
donkey22
Interesting to note that Southport’s very own Damien Moore is amongst the 20 other climate deniers.
I'd like to ask him for his explanation, as to why 1) Virtually all the earths glaciers are in retreat. 2) Why the sealevel has risen. 3) Why the global temperature has increased. 4) Why coral reefs are bleaching. 5) Why so many scientific bodies, like NASA and the Met Office are lying about climate change.
On Yer Bike!
www.20splentyforus.co.uk
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
The PNP
I'd like to ask him for his explanation, as to why 1) Virtually all the earths glaciers are in retreat. 2) Why the sealevel has risen. 3) Why the global temperature has increased. 4) Why coral reefs are bleaching. 5) Why so many scientific bodies, like NASA and the Met Office are lying about climate change.
....it's because of all the hot air you keep expelling on these pages.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
donkey22
Interesting to note that Southport’s very own Damien Moore is amongst the 20 other climate deniers.
Good heavens! You are not very well read are you? There are millions who know that the climate is as it always has been and will always be. You are daft if you believe in this Global Warming thing - you are among the minority along with a few old doddering elderly ladies.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
said
Good heavens! You are not very well read are you? There are millions who know that the climate is as it always has been and will always be. You are daft if you believe in this Global Warming thing - you are among the minority along with a few old doddering elderly ladies.
Put your tinfoil hat back on and shut up knobhead.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
donkey22
Put your tinfoil hat back on and shut up ********.
Here we go again! OK! Give me your real scientific reasoning to suppose there is such a thing as Global Warming/Climate Change. If you are unable to do this - it is you who should shut up!
Talking of propaganda, the supermarkets have now stopped telling people to distance and to wear a mask - they are now announcing to shoppers on the Tannoy system about the War in the Ukraine - that has not been done before!
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
said
Here we go again! OK! Give me your real scientific reasoning to suppose there is such a thing as Global Warming/Climate Change. If you are unable to do this - it is you who should shut up!
Debate with any type of conspiracy theorist is pointless. You don’t accept established scientific fact, and reason left the argument a long long time ago.
Last edited by donkey22; 16/04/2022 at 12:18 PM.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Here we go again! OK! Give me your real scientific reasoning to suppose there is such a thing as Global Warming/Climate Change. …
Some GCSE science just for said:
Carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas
|
- The Sun’s rays enter the Earth’s atmosphere.
- Energy is absorbed by the Earth’s surface and re-emitted at longer wavelengths, such as infrared radiation (heat).
- Some emitted heat passes through the atmosphere into space.
- Some heat is absorbed by carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. Heat is re-emitted in all directions and some becomes trapped within the Earth’s atmosphere. The Earth becomes hotter as a result.
The greenhouse effect is a natural process that keeps the Earth’s atmosphere warm. This has been essential to the evolution of life as we know it. |
However, since the Industrial Revolution, humans have been releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere faster than natural processes can remove them. For example, burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide.
The extra carbon dioxide increases the greenhouse effect, which makes the planet warmer than it would be naturally. The increase in global temperature this causes is called global warming.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 3 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
donkey22
He’s in the minority 3%.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) What We Know site states: "Based on the evidence, about 97 percent of climate scientists agree that human-caused climate change is happening."
The American association?? - are you from the third world or what? That publication is B..Sh..t. The 97% are probably a percentage of those who work for the American government and who are paid by them to support the theory - independent scientists will prove to you that it is deeply flawed.
You are only quoting links to dubious sources. What is YOUR scientific understanding of Climate Change? That's all I want to know.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
said
The American association?? - are you from the third world or what? That publication is B..Sh..t. The 97% are probably a percentage of those who work for the American government and who are paid by them to support the theory - independent scientists will prove to you that it is deeply flawed.
You are only quoting links to dubious sources. What is YOUR scientific understanding of Climate Change? That's all I want to know.
I’ll refer you back to post #10.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
donkey22
I’ll refer you back to post #10.
So I am to understand that you have no scientific understanding of the topic, yet you feel you have the right to criticise those who do. Interesting.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
said
So I am to understand that you have no scientific understanding of [climate change], yet you feel you have the right to criticise those who do. Interesting.
Interesting that you, said, C&P titbits of climate scepticism and suppose that that demonstrates you are knowledgeable on the subject.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes