|
-
Originally Posted by said
Under the 1984 Child Act, absolute priority is given to the Health and Well being of a child. Health includes mental and physical. If a very young child is exposed to alternative means of physical attraction in addition to sex, the child will obviously become confused - this is in breach of the Child Act. If a young child is informed in this manner and subsequently is approached by a pedophile - the child will consider that such acts are quite natural. Again in Breach of the Child Act.
They should certainly be taught to stay away from sick perverts who wonder publicly if it is a worse crime to rape or murder a child.
Originally Posted by MICK/GILLY
No he does not think it’s ok to be gay...
...I don’t think any father promotes gayness to his son and I don’t think any father really accepts it willingly, they may say they do for peace but it’s not what they wanted when they set out on parenthood.
So if he is gay, he'll never open up to you. He'll ever feel able to talk to you. Or if his kids are gay, they'll never be able to speak to their father about it. What a legacy. Being gay, bisexual or whatever isn't a choice. You can't 'promote' it. When did anyone on here choose to be straight?
Back to the original post. And to the other narrow minded bigots on here. Children aren't taught the mechanics of sex at an early age in school. They are taught age appropriately. They are taught about relationships and boundaries. They are taught that others shouldn't touch them without permission.
As to the paedo-curious Said's comment that children shouldn't be taught about sex until puberty or later. First of all puberty arrives at different times for kids. There's no set age. A girl might start her periods at 9 or 10. Some at 14. Boys have erections, for whatever reason, at any age. Secondly, why would you want children to be completely uniformed about what is happening to them? Why would you want some poor kid waking up with blood or 'nocturnal emissions' and wonder what the hell is happening? It's sick and cruel.
Children taught age appropriately about their own bodies, relationships and sex are far better equipped to deal with life. Far better equipped to deal with those who don't have their best interests at heart. Children who are taught that some people are straight and some people are gay aren't going to be remotely bothered or curious that Uncle Jim has a husband. Nor will they decide to beat the crap out of some poor kid that comes out as gay 15 because they are different.
Stop passing the bigotry on to future generations. How you teach your kids isn't going to stop them being gay. Or make them gay. It isn't going to stop an 11 year old having an erection, or having a period. However, it stops them from being frightened. It equips them for puberty and beyond. Stop worrying about them being gay, start teaching them not to rape or abuse others. Teach them to be open-minded, decent human beings. They'll have far less hang ups than those on display here, and be far happier people for it.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 3 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
-
Originally Posted by said
Why should that be associated with school lessons? It is not relevant.
I was asking the poster a question in response to what they had posted.
As another aside at what age did Joan decide to become Marvin in certain situations?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by seivad
Where is the media article about pensioners getting an immediate response from the police when they complained about their gay neighbours screaming and groaning? Even Google can't provide links to events that never happened.
Was that the one in March 2009, published by the Daily Mail? Nothing about screaming though. It would not surprise me - there were a couple who moved in near my mate - they were forever in the garden screaming at one another and slapping each other around the face. I saw them once when I called round to see him. It was rather amusing since it was not a common event to see.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Yea I think you are twisting my words there a bit, I said he can talk to me about anything and he is the type to say what he feels, his orientation is his own choosing he appears to be in the same mind as me and if he isn’t then it is what it is , no father wants that, nobody is promoting gayness but telling kids it’s ok just don’t sit right with me. I also think gay women are very nice indeed ..
That’s how I see it not what you twisted it to.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by Toodles McGinty
So how about you are you a gay man or woman or something like that ?.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
Was that the one in March 2009, published by the Daily Mail? Nothing about screaming though. It would not surprise me - there were a couple who moved in near my mate - they were forever in the garden screaming at one another and slapping each other around the face. I saw them once when I called round to see him. It was rather amusing since it was not a common event to see.
I can not believe it;-
1. It was over 10 years ago.
2. It was in the Daily Mail.
3. You are claiming to have a mate.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by MICK/GILLY
So how about you are you a gay man or woman or something like that ?.
Why on earth would you need to know? What difference does it make to anyone, apart from whoever I'm in a relationship with?
I would have thought previous posts would answer that, but what on God's earth gives you the right to question the details about another poster's intimate life?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
So you don’t like to talk about it then ?.. there’s not supposed to be any shame attached to it nowerdays you know and if you are not proud of yourself enough to share then fair enough I understand. And as you will see from my posts I think good luck to you and whatever it is you do or are.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
As has been said eloquently by someone else on this thread school lessons are age appropriate and at primary level deal mostly with relationships and appropriate/inappropriate touching. They don't tell children that being gay is acceptable. Rather they stress that there are all types of relationships, that all are deserving of our respect. There may well be children in a class that have two dads or two mums, or no mum and dad, or grandma is bringing them up, or they are adopted. Saying that gayness is being promoted is very far from the truth and says more about the person who thinks that. Very probably they were taught to be fearful of 'shirt lifters' or else they are repressing their own homosexual tendencies because they are 'not normal'. The use of the proper name for things such as parts of the body or sexual orientation actually empower children and help to avoid the s******ing approach to sex that so many of the older generation seem afflicted with.
Sex education at older ages builds on this and may include the actual physical act of sex or not depending on the school. I would say, having taught such lessons, that knowledge is preferrable to ignorance. Unfortunately children of very young ages can be exposed to porn, some of which is quite violent. Wouldn't we rather have children know that sex is/can be and act of love, not one of exploitation and dominance. Knowing doesn't turn them into sex fiends. It might be disconcerting to have your 6 year old come home and talk about penises and vaginas but if you get the vapours it will be you who is teaching them that sex is shameful and dirty not the school.
Edited to say that I did not put asterisks in the word s******ing. The algorythm must have a dirty mind.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
What is odomis and why has the algorithm only banned the middle out of the word
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Back on course, it seems our less enlightened posters haven't cottoned on to the fact that a celibate person who shuns all physical contact might still want to understand why their bodies doing what it's doing.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by Toodles McGinty
Why on earth would you need to know? What difference does it make to anyone, apart from whoever I'm in a relationship with?
I would have thought previous posts would answer that, but what on God's earth gives you the right to question the details about another poster's intimate life?
Boy! Did you of all people REALLY write that? You, who are constantly probing into my identity and who I really AM? I think that this post of yours makes you one hell of a HYPOCRITE!
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by Alikado
I can not believe it;-
1. It was over 10 years ago.
2. It was in the Daily Mail.
3. You are claiming to have a mate.
Which of those cannot you believe?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
Which of those cannot you believe?
All THREE !
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
|
Search Qlocal (powered by google)
Privacy & Cookie Policy
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Booking.com
Supporting Local Business
Be Seen - Advertise on Qlocal
UK, Local Online News Community, Forums, Chats, For Sale, Classified, Offers, Vouchers, Events, Motors Sale, Property For Sale Rent, Jobs, Hotels, Taxi, Restaurants, Pubs, Clubs, Pictures, Sports, Charities, Lost Found
UK,
UK News,
|