-
How sad.
Originally Posted by
local
Here you are Prof some real science, its from the much quoted Nasa:
If Earth’s temperatures are getting warmer and sea ice in the Arctic has been shrinking fast, why then is sea ice in the Antarctic slowly increasing?
https://earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/sen...unexpected-ice
How embarrassing to try and use one dataset from 2014 to try and prove a fictitious point. It seems that you have a tenuous grip of the scientific method.
I'll help you out with a link explaining the ice loss, it's from the much quoted NASA.
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_res...oss-2002-2020/
It's a video, which will make it easier for you to understand.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
-
Originally Posted by
Dirac
How embarrassing to try and use one dataset from 2014 to try and prove a fictitious point. It seems that you have a tenuous grip of the scientific method.
I'll help you out with a link explaining the ice loss, it's from the much quoted NASA.
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_res...oss-2002-2020/
It's a video, which will make it easier for you to understand.
Dear me you have jumped in without thinking there.
I am not in any way a climate change nor more importantly a pollution denier.
I feel you have just picked up a train of thought seen my name and let loose.
You could apologise?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
local
Here you are Prof some real science, its from the much quoted Nasa:
If Earth’s temperatures are getting warmer and sea ice in the Arctic has been shrinking fast, why then is sea ice in the Antarctic slowly increasing?
https://earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/sen...unexpected-ice
You should enjoy quoting this and it goes to my point about the mumbo jumbo portrayed as science on here.
The earth is a sh9t hole lets clean it up instead of these silly arguments.
These fully comitted 100% on either side, who cannot be scientists should take on board
“Partial explanations have been offered, but we don’t have the complete picture,” said Ted Scambos, a scientist at NSIDC DAAC. “
This may just be a case of ‘we don’t know yet.’”
I see you’ve swapped out your MAGA hat for a tinfoil one?
Still not a good look sorry. Have you tried a post dunce hat yet?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Steady on.
I am the dunce.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
bensherman
Steady on.
I am the dunce.
Group speaking dunces at that too!
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
donkey22
I see you’ve swapped out your MAGA hat for a tinfoil one?
Still not a good look sorry. Have you tried a post dunce hat yet?
You might read back a bit and get the context, I doubt it but still.
Your new thick groupthink friend does make a good ally.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
bensherman
Steady on.
I am the dunce.
Yes you have proved that on numerous occasions,
the same for you with that same futility,
You might read back a bit and get the context, I doubt it but still.
Your new thick groupthink friend does make a good ally.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
local
Were you not at school when they froze some water in the science class?
Which is precisely the reason I suggested you calculated future sealevel rise, based on weight of melting ice covering Antarctica and Greenland etc - and not its frozen volume - duh!
On Yer Bike!
www.20splentyforus.co.uk
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
The PNP
Which is precisely the reason I suggested you calculated future sealevel rise, based on
weight of melting ice covering Antarctica and Greenland etc - and not its frozen
volume - duh!
I don't think local's school taught science, on the basis of her/his recent posts.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
Dirac
I don't think local's school taught science, on the basis of her/his recent posts.
You could of just apologised instead of pursuing the groupthink agenda, you clearly hadn't got the context correct.
Quite bizarre,
you do now realise that in agreeing with PNP you are associating yourself with the forum's biggest self-proclaimed polluter who thinks chopping down trees and burning them is somehow green.
I wonder if you can give us some evidence for his 200 feet sea level rise for Southport?
He also lectures us all on vehicle use whilst running a fleet of dirty diesel's.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 1 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
local
You could of
I take back my previous comment about local's school.
It looks like she/he didn't actually attend one.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
Dirac
I don't think local's school taught science, on the basis of her/his recent posts.
Local’s school?
That’s a very generous assumption to make.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Aah friends sweet
Nurture that group................
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
local
Aah friends sweet
Nurture that group................
They are more than Just friends it’s the same old same old bunch with a new account they/he started a day or so ago to argue along with them, the liking each other’s posts give it away, don’t bite local, you have upset a bicyclist and they trolling you still it’s sad, trolling is now allowed and the norm on here now as nothing is done about it .
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes