Sheryl Flint whats she about?

[silver fox]

Woohoo! Seivad & I get a mention on one of the photos. Have to say, Shezza's page is much more interesting that Crimewatch Joanie's.


Attachment 196795

Fame, or should that be infamy at last

[seivad]

And apparenty, as promised, something has dropped on Fb!

We'll be tuning in later. It can be nice to also have a stream of reactions to read through .

Oh my, she certainly has! Unlike me, Sheryl isn't bound by member's confidentiality, although I have to say that even in her position, I wouldn't plaster somebody's name and address on an FB page.

She's pretty resourceful though. She's managed to find all the information that I have, without my advantages and in such a short period of time. If she does post the address, it could be pretty busy down there tonight. Maybe it could even become a future tourist attraction.

Draw the curtains tonight Joan, and for goodness sake, try and look respectable!

[said]

It would not be prudent of Ms. Flint to even try that route - she has far more ghosts in her cupboard that she is very keen not to be known. If you wish to call such people your 'friend' that is your choice and it is very revealing.

I don't suppose you would understand about Socks V5 would you? I thought not! Yes, it will be great fun - I have been in touch with the people who are affected, the issue was explained to them and they are willing to rock and roll.

Funny you getting involved though - I would have thought as an administrator you would know the legal obligations of publishing and the outcome of those who do not follow the rules - what happens if an innocent person's personal details are published without permission ? It will certainly be most interesting.

I also don't see you as one of their in pub crowd. But hey - I am not concerned, I can make money out of this.

[Desert Region]

Silver Fox is very much a bog standard hetrosexual male, certainly have no personal dealings with the apparently motley collection of Saids"

Methinks (I hope) he doth refer to another adversary, presumably this lady who has apparently ruffled his/hers/its feathers .
,

Ah! I see .

[said]

Fame, or should that be infamy at last

Ha!Ha! Should be right up your street. One of the posters has just requested that the page name should be changed from Southport Crimewatch to Southport Crankwatch. Some one else is inquiring as to what happened to the Kennedy Rogers guy? SF (the other one) must be pretty unhappy by now.

[Desert Region]

Have you asked yourself the most obvious question? SF blocks EVERYONE who disagrees with her and always has done. Even Roving Eye said that he had been blocked by her as well.

As you say - all publicity is good publicity, something SF cherishes - in this case, her responses, and those of her colleagues, have been highly detrimental to her public reputation, but as far as her local one there are no surprises.

Have you not spotted your contradiction?

If as you say all publicity is good publicity for Sheryl, then her blocking "EVERYONE" who disagrees with her would contradict that maxim.

[*concerned*]

Apparently, once it's mastered English, it will be teaching other Moldovan-speaking dogs .

Pssssst, the official language of Moldova is Romanian

[Desert Region]

Ha!Ha! Should be right up your street. One of the posters has just requested that the page name should be changed from Southport Crimewatch to Southport Crankwatch. Some one else is inquiring as to what happened to the Kennedy Rogers guy? SF (the other one) must be pretty unhappy by now.

And how is any of this going to be helping with whatever remains of your credibility as Birkdale Crimewatch? .

People are questioning the 'why' but no-one is challenging the 'what.'

You have noticed that no-one is actually disputing the veracity of the information she's providing?!

Still, there is that small consolation for you in that Sheryl has not, so far, helped her own reputation, with the way in which she has presented the fruits of her detective work.

I suppose you can always cling onto that crumb of comfort .

[Desert Region]

Pssssst, the official language of Moldova is Romanian

Well, I was quoting Birkdale Crimewatch, so I kept it simple by keeping the term.

It is more of a political dimension and controversy than anything:

Moldovans warned to stop calling Romanian language Moldovan

https://www.euronews.com/2020/01/30/...anian-moldovan

[seivad]

It would not be prudent of Ms. Flint to even try that route - she has far more ghosts in her cupboard that she is very keen not to be known. If you wish to call such people your 'friend' that is your choice and it is very revealing.

I don't suppose you would understand about Socks V5 would you? I thought not! Yes, it will be great fun - I have been in touch with the people who are affected, the issue was explained to them and they are willing to rock and roll.

Funny you getting involved though - I would have thought as an administrator you would know the legal obligations of publishing and the outcome of those who do not follow the rules - what happens if an innocent person's personal details are published without permission ? It will certainly be most interesting.

I also don't see you as one of their in pub crowd. But hey - I am not concerned, I can make money out of this.

You haven't quoted me, but as you mention 'administrator', are you responding to me?

'Friend, pub crowd'... What on earth are you talking about? I don't know Sheryl. I haven't referred to her as a 'friend'. You're right about one thing though. As I live 3,000 miles away and I'm old enough to be her granny, it's highly unlikely that anyone would see me as one of her in pub crowd.

As pointed out numerous times, and once again in my last post, I have not and would not post any member's name, address, or phone number. And, as I pointed out above, if I were Sheryl I wouldn't post them on FB. You might have been wise not to post your phone number on Q's classifieds. It made it so much easier to tie you with the long list of alter egos, and makes your denials ridiculous.

Apparently you had no qualms about posting Sheryl's address on FB. And I don't recall you having any qualms, when, as Desiree and a couple of her son's alter egos, you tried to find personal details about a female member who had experienced a few disagreements with Desiree. I laughed when I noticed on your CB page that this member has 'liked' your page. She would have a very different view if she knew it was Desiree.

Don't try throwing techy terms at me. As has been proven many times over, you're an outright liar.

[Desert Region]

It is not in my nature to be vindictive, I would never lower my standards to that level.

Apparently you had no qualms about posting Sheryl's address on FB. And I don't recall you having any qualms, when, as Desiree and a couple of her son's alter egos, you tried to find personal details about a female member who had experienced a few disagreements with Desiree. I laughed when I noticed on your CB page that this member has 'liked' your page. She would have a very different view if she knew it was Desiree.

.

[Desert Region]

No - I am not a hypocrite. Far too many people seem to have taken it on themselves to change the Darwin theory. You NEVER should treat a dog as a human and you should never treat a human as a dog. Heavens - if you had a pet goat/sheep/giraffe/elephant etc., would you take that into a hotel and feed it human foods? It would be totally cruel to the animal. Hey - while we are at it, why not strap a backpack on a pet dogs back and send it to school?

If you are going to a function, and you have an expensive suit to wear - would you look great turning up in a suit full of dog hairs? Wonderful! Far too many people are either ignorant about a dog's needs and/or consider that their pet's needs are above everyone else's. What does it matter if a dog cannot get out of an unfamiliar place to pee or use other toilet functions , ' Do it on the floor - after all I don't live here' is a very common response.

If you want to argue a response - why not give a good argument, instead of trying to imply some vague notion?

You made your attitude towards dogs repeatedly, emphatically, comprehensively clear in another thread, Dog Friendly Hotels.

Your argument's summation and recommendations are rounded up in post #70...

https://www.qlocal.co.uk/southport/f...s-55032615.htm

[Desert Region]

It is not in my nature to be vindictive, I would never lower my standards to that level.

It was your views in this thread, Masks compulsory in shops, that led to your most recent Forum ban, wasn't it?

https://www.qlocal.co.uk/southport/f...s-55046527.htm

[Toodles McGinty]

It would not be prudent of Ms. Flint to even try that route - she has far more ghosts in her cupboard that she is very keen not to be known. If you wish to call such people your 'friend' that is your choice and it is very revealing.

I don't suppose you would understand about Socks V5 would you? I thought not! Yes, it will be great fun - I have been in touch with the people who are affected, the issue was explained to them and they are willing to rock and roll.

Funny you getting involved though - I would have thought as an administrator you would know the legal obligations of publishing and the outcome of those who do not follow the rules - what happens if an innocent person's personal details are published without permission ? It will certainly be most interesting.

I also don't see you as one of their in pub crowd. But hey - I am not concerned, I can make money out of this.

Give it up, Joanie.

Go back to bickering on Crankwatch.

[Desert Region]

It would not be prudent of Ms. Flint to even try that route - she has far more ghosts in her cupboard that she is very keen not to be known. If you wish to call such people your 'friend' that is your choice and it is very revealing.

I don't suppose you would understand about Socks V5 would you? I thought not! Yes, it will be great fun - I have been in touch with the people who are affected, the issue was explained to them and they are willing to rock and roll.

Funny you getting involved though - I would have thought as an administrator you would know the legal obligations of publishing and the outcome of those who do not follow the rules - what happens if an innocent person's personal details are published without permission ? It will certainly be most interesting.

I also don't see you as one of their in pub crowd. But hey - I am not concerned, I can make money out of this.

You may as well keep on running with trying to maintain a brass neck and brave face. There's nothing to lose, or gain, by doing that.

You claim things are "great fun".

Sure they are...

You have dozens of usernames and online aliases and invest them all with fantasy backgrounds and status. That's (multiple) escape pod launches from the mundanity of reaiity into a fantasy world wherein you have status and importance.

That's your narcissism flailing about for food and water, for sustenance. The endless spouting of conspiricy theories are just an added means of attracting attention and feeling special. They also fall within the compass of your actual intellectual ability.

So, are you really finding it "great fun" that your actual identiity etc, amongst the puddle of aliases, has been revealed to all and sundry on a very popular local Fb site?

No. Obviously you're not.

I think that your experience on QLocal may have contributed to your downfall. A series of temporary bans and virtual slaps on the wrists - but, no, you never learnt how to behave. It's been a slapstick experience that's fed your hubris.

So, outside this site, in the bigger (though still local) virtual world, you start fueding, and are shocked down to your boots to find that you've bitten off more than you can chew.

But, narcissism allowing, maybe you can learn from the experience?

I can make money out of this.

Sure.

This time next year you'll be a millionaire...