-
Originally Posted by
said
Let's see if we can get those little grey cells of yours moving a bit.
We are informed that there is a deadly pandemic across most of the Anglosphere. The numbers of cases are rising fast and massive numbers of people are dead and dying. So people are all wearing masks and keeping a distance to prevent further contagion. So it would not matter whether you were in a confined area or out in the air - you would still maintain safety measures, right?
When you are wearing masks for protection while carrying out a particularly hazardous task - what would be the necessity of continuing to wear that protection when you have completed that task?
But people have become wary of the restrictions we are all being asked to follow since they do not have any relevance to any virus. So why are we all being restricted in this way? Why are our freedoms being denied? When there is no logical answer, when there is no scientific basis for such restrictions? These are the questions many ordinary people have been asking themselves - the result is protests by large numbers of a mixed populace and the fact that only a few people are wearing the masks outside of shops. If people really felt threatened by a contagion - they would be wearing full HAZMAT suits, let alone the few wearing masks.
The big question is why all these restrictions? I have some ideas - but it would appear that such a discussion is not an option on this site.
Batcr@p crazy.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
-
Originally Posted by
joan ofarc
Batcr@p crazy.
I would have thought you could have put forward a far better argument than that - still, I have been wrong before.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
said
I would have thought you could have put forward a far better argument than that - still, I have been wrong before.
Nice of you to admit it, but then again you have been wrong more often that just about everyone else combined on this site.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
said
I would have thought you could have put forward a far better argument than that - still, I have been wrong before.
I did but you haven't seen fit to answer my post.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
said
Originally Posted by
local
I did but you haven't seen fit to answer my post.
"Said" is totally mad. Why does anybody take him on board. In reply to one of his other threads Give us your current employment job description. Should amuse every one.Based on your national insurance contributions for last 10 years...
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
PENTHOUSEJOE
"Said" is totally mad. Why does anybody take him on board. In reply to one of his other threads Give us your current employment job description. Should amuse every one.Based on your national insurance contributions for last 10 years...
You're bluffing.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
Desert Region
You're bluffing.
what on his job description.....
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
PENTHOUSEJOE
what on his job description.....
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by
PENTHOUSEJOE
"Said" is totally mad. Why does anybody take him on board. In reply to one of his other threads Give us your current employment job description. Should amuse every one.Based on your national insurance contributions for last 10 years...
Well, this was mentioned on roving-eye's 'Sheryl Flint whats she about' thread:
Originally Posted by
Starling
Or maybe the contract cleaning business is just a cover for something a bit dodgy?
https://southport.qlocal.co.uk/south...55046890-7.htm
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes