Originally Posted by local

You need something to wash that bile out of you.

Is it that tough at the bottom?

Full of bile? Is this the absolute limit of your imagination?
Gotta be an improvement on your ***** for brains I suppose.

Originally Posted by donkey22

Full of bile? Is this the absolute limit of your imagination?
Gotta be an improvement on your ***** for brains I suppose.

I think you are mixing me up with someone else on the **** for brains,

I wasn't exploring my imagination just noting you seem to be a rather unhappy person.

Avoiding a restaurant because of the owner's politics does seem rather short-sighted Southports' own Marcus Wareings for instance would have to be ruled out.

Originally Posted by local

I think you are mixing me up with someone else on the **** for brains,

I wasn't exploring my imagination just noting you seem to be a rather unhappy person.

Avoiding a restaurant because of the owner's politics does seem rather short-sighted Southports' own Marcus Wareings for instance would have to be ruled out.

Nope. Am a very happy person thanks. Just don’t want to give any of my hard earned cash to a prospective tory candidate. I’ll spend my money where I see fit. And from what I’ve heard, it would probably turn out to be a disappointing experience on the food side of things anyway.
That aside, the nonsense and drivel you post here is plenty to keep me amused during these dark times.

Originally Posted by Little Londoner

Don't worry it will be closed thanks to providing a facility that was neither warranted or needed.
If you can get into your head the fact that the large percentage of cyclists are brainless fools who ride where THEY want to ride not where they are supposed to ride even you may realise how pathetic this closing roads to traffic and providing something that is NOT used without any consultation is both ridiculous and unwanted.

I want all idiot drivers taken off the road just as much as I want all idiot cyclists taken off the pavement.

Bit of a sweeping generalisation from you. Cyclists are far from brainless, or foolish, or ride where they want. Also, no roads are CLOSED, they are all accessible, there has just been some segregation installed. Finally, I don't remember there being any consultation when roads where converted from farm tracks, to cycling and ultimately for motorised transport? Where was the consultation for that?

Queen's Road is one way. When are the Council going to enforce the law?

On all the cars that ignore the signs.

Originally Posted by susanb

Queen's Road is one way. When are the Council going to enforce the law?

On all the cars that ignore the signs.

It's not one way. You can enter it from any side road and travel along it either way.

Originally Posted by lawed143

Bit of a sweeping generalisation from you. Cyclists are far from brainless, or foolish, or ride where they want. Also, no roads are CLOSED, they are all accessible, there has just been some segregation installed. Finally, I don't remember there being any consultation when roads where converted from farm tracks, to cycling and ultimately for motorised transport? Where was the consultation for that?

Blimey I thought the computer was in English mode, do you understand what "a large percentage" means it doesn't mean ALL . Go out with your eyes open for once look at the empty cycle lanes then have a walk round and see how many cyclists you encounter on the pavements or dressed in dark clothing in the dark with no lights you will probably find a LARGE PERCENTAGE are riding as described above. As Queens Rd has a NO ENTRY sign at each end and a Buses and Cycles ONLY sign to everyone other than Bus Drivers or the odd legal cyclist IT IS CLOSED. As for the lanes to roads you must enlighten us as you were obviously around in the 19th Century.

Originally Posted by Little Londoner

Blimey I thought the computer was in English mode.....

As Queens Rd has a NO ENTRY sign at each end and a Buses and Cycles ONLY sign to everyone other than Bus Drivers or the odd legal cyclist IT IS CLOSED.

You need to check the 'English mode' on your computer!

Yes, there is a No Entry sign at each end, but you can enter from any one of the side roads.

While Queens Road may be restricted, it is NOT closed!

Originally Posted by Sap33

You need to check the 'English mode' on your computer!

Yes, there is a No Entry sign at each end, but you can enter from any one of the side roads.

While Queens Road may be restricted, it is NOT closed!

I think NO ENTRY signs are pretty clear in their meaning, perhaps you can get the idiot to badger the council for some pink selected entry signs. I join Leyland Rd at the Promenade and drive the full length to Roe Lane and the number of cars using Queens road has barely altered since it was made NO ENTRY. Some improvement there then?

Originally Posted by Little Londoner

I think NO ENTRY signs are pretty clear in their meaning, perhaps you can get the idiot to badger the council for some pink selected entry signs. I join Leyland Rd at the Promenade and drive the full length to Roe Lane and the number of cars using Queens road has barely altered since it was made NO ENTRY. Some improvement there then?

Considering you claim to be a great driver (although I'm still waiting on proof of that and doubt you'll have the decency to reply!), you seem to be deliberately obtuse.

You stated (in capital letters!) that the road is was closed, when it clearly isn't. Just because a large number of drivers seem to think they can choose to ignore the signs doesn't make it right. Something which if you saw a cyclist do, you'd be your usual apoplectic self!