Following the Science?

[said]

We could well ask you the very same question, In my experience know it alls generally know F A, from your posts on any and every subject on this forum, IMO you fall into that category, plus ultra gullible to every alternative theory going.

Considering your claimed wide and varied work experience, may I suggest you have a degree in BS.

From what I have read on this site - I am not the gullible one, not by a long chalk!

I most certainly don't know everything, I only wish I did. There are a huge number of people who know their own field far deeper than I could even guess at. There are also many areas of knowledge in which I have no interest in whatever. The little that I do have allows me to enjoy great discussions on many topics and keeps me happy.

You also use personal abuse by which to belittle me - may I ask by what authority, or on whose direction do you measure your standards? How would you know if it was I who was misinforming you, or if it was another person who had misinformed you, but which you had chosen to believe, or are you personally able to differentiate between the facts based on your knowledge?

I do indeed have a very broad employment experience. Why do you find that so hard to believe? I have seldom been a 9 -5 person, and I am never at a loss for something to do. Many a time I have worked from the early hours of a morning and finished late at night. I work during summer holidays, Bank Holidays, Weekends etc.,and have carried out as many as four different employment situations in any one day. There are a huge number of people who can attest to this. The work I do is not a chore, it is fun, life is fun, I meet up with so many people from all walks of life and learn more everyday - once work became boring I just changed my job to anything I fancied trying out. There are many people who do and have done, exactly the same, and probably even more so.

To be very honest - if I had been told that I had to work in the same job, at the same place for the whole of my working life I would have become a criminal so that I could be put in a prison, it would have been far more interesting.

Whether you believe me or not, it does not matter, most certainly not to me, it doesn't. If others want to believe your rambling that is their prerogative - it is just a great pity that you cannot establish an interesting logical argument instead of issuing diatribe to those who offend your beliefs.

[Hector]

From what I have read on this site - I am not the gullible one, not by a long chalk!

I most certainly don't know everything, I only wish I did. There are a huge number of people who know their own field far deeper than I could even guess at. There are also many areas of knowledge in which I have no interest in whatever. The little that I do have allows me to enjoy great discussions on many topics and keeps me happy.

You also use personal abuse by which to belittle me - may I ask by what authority, or on whose direction do you measure your standards? How would you know if it was I who was misinforming you, or if it was another person who had misinformed you, but which you had chosen to believe, or are you personally able to differentiate between the facts based on your knowledge?

I do indeed have a very broad employment experience. Why do you find that so hard to believe? I have seldom been a 9 -5 person, and I am never at a loss for something to do. Many a time I have worked from the early hours of a morning and finished late at night. I work during summer holidays, Bank Holidays, Weekends etc.,and have carried out as many as four different employment situations in any one day. There are a huge number of people who can attest to this. The work I do is not a chore, it is fun, life is fun, I meet up with so many people from all walks of life and learn more everyday - once work became boring I just changed my job to anything I fancied trying out. There are many people who do and have done, exactly the same, and probably even more so.

To be very honest - if I had been told that I had to work in the same job, at the same place for the whole of my working life I would have become a criminal so that I could be put in a prison, it would have been far more interesting.

Whether you believe me or not, it does not matter, most certainly not to me, it doesn't. If others want to believe your rambling that is their prerogative - it is just a great pity that you cannot establish an interesting logical argument instead of issuing diatribe to those who offend your beliefs.

Cool down, Said.

You know you enjoy stimulating a variety of responses.

But for your own benefit? perhaps you should consider using your writing talent and general knowledge to enlighten a wider audience. A YouTube channel perhaps?

[silver fox]

From what I have read on this site - I am not the gullible one, not by a long chalk!

I most certainly don't know everything, I only wish I did. There are a huge number of people who know their own field far deeper than I could even guess at. There are also many areas of knowledge in which I have no interest in whatever. The little that I do have allows me to enjoy great discussions on many topics and keeps me happy.

You also use personal abuse by which to belittle me - may I ask by what authority, or on whose direction do you measure your standards? How would you know if it was I who was misinforming you, or if it was another person who had misinformed you, but which you had chosen to believe, or are you personally able to differentiate between the facts based on your knowledge?

I do indeed have a very broad employment experience. Why do you find that so hard to believe? I have seldom been a 9 -5 person, and I am never at a loss for something to do. Many a time I have worked from the early hours of a morning and finished late at night. I work during summer holidays, Bank Holidays, Weekends etc.,and have carried out as many as four different employment situations in any one day. There are a huge number of people who can attest to this. The work I do is not a chore, it is fun, life is fun, I meet up with so many people from all walks of life and learn more everyday - once work became boring I just changed my job to anything I fancied trying out. There are many people who do and have done, exactly the same, and probably even more so.

To be very honest - if I had been told that I had to work in the same job, at the same place for the whole of my working life I would have become a criminal so that I could be put in a prison, it would have been far more interesting.

Whether you believe me or not, it does not matter, most certainly not to me, it doesn't. If others want to believe your rambling that is their prerogative - it is just a great pity that you cannot establish an interesting logical argument instead of issuing diatribe to those who offend your beliefs.

That rattled your cage a little, of course I can only speak my opinion, but your claim of a wide and varied work experience, in the main requiring different qualifications and knowledge, does not ring true, you must also be aware that you have been proved wrong on so many occasions that very few believe anything you post.

Gullible? tell me who latches onto any and every conspiracy theory going? who is that claims that they have better understanding of what is actually happening? who is it who claims regular contact and discourse with most ethnic communities in the country, with academics, with highly qualified people in most subjects?

If you regard my opinion as personal abuse, sorry to offend, but that is my opinion, you don’t need me to belittle you, you do that very successfully on your own, have a nice day.

PS
You say I resort to belittling you, hate to remind you that is your standard response to anyone who dares to question or doubt you, clearly that is OK for you, but you are clearly beyond question.

[local]

It's a good point our resident Professor clearly has a real world logic issue.


His "Pick and Mix" science posts are clearly not grounded in any recognised academia.

[said]

It's a good point our resident Professor clearly has a real world logic issue.


His "Pick and Mix" science posts are clearly not grounded in any recognised academia.

Ha!Ha! After having to explain that it is very easy for a person to be involved in a broad employment experience, which for some weird reason people could not fathom out - I do not feel it necessary to prove myself further. I am content to let people believe what they want, not my problem.

It is interesting that you indicate you are an academic - may I ask the field in which you studied?

[said]

That rattled your cage a little, of course I can only speak my opinion, but your claim of a wide and varied work experience, in the main requiring different qualifications and knowledge, does not ring true, you must also be aware that you have been proved wrong on so many occasions that very few believe anything you post.

Gullible? tell me who latches onto any and every conspiracy theory going? who is that claims that they have better understanding of what is actually happening? who is it who claims regular contact and discourse with most ethnic communities in the country, with academics, with highly qualified people in most subjects?

If you regard my opinion as personal abuse, sorry to offend, but that is my opinion, you don’t need me to belittle you, you do that very successfully on your own, have a nice day.

PS
You say I resort to belittling you, hate to remind you that is your standard response to anyone who dares to question or doubt you, clearly that is OK for you, but you are clearly beyond question.

Would it not be true to say that if someone has a very broad employment history, they could also possess other attributes. Assuming that this is feasible, would it not also be correct to say that person is highly likely to meet a very large number of people while working?

If you accept that is likely to be true, then it is conceivable that person has a very broad understanding of life in general which allows an insight on a level completely different to that of someone who lacks that ability. Don't you agree?

So on that basis, it is easy to recognise who has that ability and who does not - yet it is those who do not have those attributes who consider themselves far more knowledgeable thanks to Google.

[silver fox]

Would it not be true to say that if someone has a very broad employment history, they could also possess other attributes. Assuming that this is feasible, would it not also be correct to say that person is highly likely to meet a very large number of people while working?

If you accept that is likely to be true, then it is conceivable that person has a very broad understanding of life in general which allows an insight on a level completely different to that of someone who lacks that ability. Don't you agree?

So on that basis, it is easy to recognise who has that ability and who does not - yet it is those who do not have those attributes who consider themselves far more knowledgeable thanks to Google.

I have had a number of jobs in different industries or business, I'n not for one minute denying that this can give a more varied experience, what I do know is that when you make a big change in work/career, you very rarely move instantly to a position of authority or responsibility, unless of course you are merely moving employers within the same business.

[local]

Ha!Ha! After having to explain that it is very easy for a person to be involved in a broad employment experience, which for some weird reason people could not fathom out - I do not feel it necessary to prove myself further. I am content to let people believe what they want, not my problem.

It is interesting that you indicate you are an academic - may I ask the field in which you studied?

No need to prove yourself "further"

It is blindingly obvious where you are at on your learning journey.

You have been picking and mixing for some time, often with out-of-date content.

If someone could be bothered your history on here has let's say a mixed history.

I would suggest a period of quiet reflection and learning.



I haven't indicated that I am an academic.

[said]

No need to prove yourself "further"

It is blindingly obvious where you are at on your learning journey.

You have been picking and mixing for some time, often with out-of-date content.

If someone could be bothered your history on here has let's say a mixed history.

I would suggest a period of quiet reflection and learning.



I haven't indicated that I am an academic.

You have more than indicated you are an academic. First you refute anything I scientifically state - although without any logical argument. To be able to do that, you would have to think you knew more than I do. Secondly, you feel it necessary to give me instruction - as in the role of a teacher, but err by the fact that you do the same things yourself.

What is wrong with people? At one time, you could have a laugh and everyone joined in - would it be that people have not only looked like zombies over the past year, but they have adopted the mind set of a zombie too?

[local]

You have more than indicated you are an academic. First you refute anything I scientifically state - although without any logical argument. To be able to do that, you would have to think you knew more than I do. Secondly, you feel it necessary to give me instruction - as in the role of a teacher, but err by the fact that you do the same things yourself.

What is wrong with people? At one time, you could have a laugh and everyone joined in - would it be that people have not only looked like zombies over the past year, but they have adopted the mind set of a zombie too?

But you fall down on your first line, is it any wonder you are not taken seriously, pray how do you state anything scientifically?


Quoting or more often cutting and pasting from your meanderings across the nether reaches of the web does not imbue you with any authority to state anything.

The Zombies appear to control your thinking.

None of your often dangerous scientific factoids have stood the test of time and your fantasy employment history is inspired by the works of Keith Waterhouse.

[said]

But you fall down on your first line, is it any wonder you are not taken seriously, pray how do you state anything scientifically?


Quoting or more often cutting and pasting from your meanderings across the nether reaches of the web does not imbue you with any authority to state anything.

The Zombies appear to control your thinking.

None of your often dangerous scientific factoids have stood the test of time and your fantasy employment history is inspired by the works of Keith Waterhouse.

Arrogant Pr..!

[gsgsgs]

Arrogant Pr..!

We really have spat our dummy out haven't we, when you finally realise you've lost the argument you resort to name calling, so childish.

[local]

The trouble is it's often irresponsible if not dangerous tosh "it" spews out.

Clearly, some of us are poles apart politically on here but there is a consensus across this divide that Said posts specious claptrap science with the understanding of someone in the special needs centile.

[said]

We really have spat our dummy out haven't we, when you finally realise you've lost the argument you resort to name calling, so childish.

That is not name calling it is a precise description. I have every sympathy with people who are mentally disabled, but none whatever with arrogance.

[said]

The trouble is it's often irresponsible if not dangerous tosh "it" spews out.

Clearly, some of us are poles apart politically on here but there is a consensus across this divide that Said posts specious claptrap science with the understanding of someone in the special needs centile.

You know absolutely nothing about science - so don't pretend that you know more than I. If you want a verbal competition, choose any scientific subject you like - and I will respond logically, and without having to resort to looking on Google just to give you some link relating to it. I would prefer my native language of course, but I can respond in French, German or Spanish if you prefer. Any field you like.