Just so's you Know

[said]

He / she / it can't see the virus therefore in their minds (if they have one between them) it doesn't exist therefore masks are totally useless and not required. Simple really just like them.

My standing in society is that I am a black, disabled, dwarf, jewish traveller transvestite with gay tendencies - so 'it' may be more accurate as a title.

Simple only if you do not wish to understand.

News for you! No-one has SEEN the virus. We do not have any optical instruments in the whole world that have that resolution. There are millions of viruses which exist. Everyone has millions of these in their body. One of the contentious issues over a virus is that unless it can be identified, the risk is that anything introduced to fight it, may kill the viruses that we depend on for our health.

I will say again. Look at a tiny pin head. Imagine 50,000 viruses (germs) sitting on that pin head side by side. That is how small a virus is. Now take an air molecule, which is a hundred times larger than a virus. If just ONE air molecule can get through a mask, in or out, and by breathing you intake thousand of molecules of air then you could be breathing in, hypothetically, thousands of viruses - which we do every second of our lives. Where is your argument against that?

The only way you can keep other people safe is by being 'healthy' your self and allowing your own body defences to fight any 'bad' viruses. That is how humans have managed to survive for many thousands of years.

It is only in comparatively recent years, that the number of diseases have been increasing. This could be for a number of reasons:

1. Easier interrnational travel.
2. People having greater interaction with animals
3. Medical interference against natural defences.
4. The world becoming more populated.
5. Far greater use of drugs and chemicals.

I really, REALLY would like to hear ANY argument you have against these facts. Until such statements are proved to be wrong - then you have to accept that they are correct. It is not that I am 'superior' in any way, heaven forbid - I am no different to anyone else, it is just that no-one has disproved anything I have said.

[gsgsgs]

It is only in comparatively recent years, that the number of diseases have been increasing. This could be for a number of reasons:

1. Easier interrnational travel.
2. People having greater interaction with animals
3. Medical interference against natural defences.
4. The world becoming more populated.
5. Far greater use of drugs and chemicals.

You missed covidiots, antimaskers & antivaxers who refuse to follow simple rules to protect the vulnerable.

[Toodles McGinty]

We do not have any optical instruments in the whole world that have that resolution.

Scanning and electron microscopes show viruses clearly. If you are talking about optical instruments alone, you're just being pedantic.

And not proving any point whatsoever.

[local]

My standing in society is that I am a black, disabled, dwarf, jewish traveller transvestite with gay tendencies - so 'it' may be more accurate as a title.

Simple only if you do not wish to understand.

News for you! No-one has SEEN the virus. We do not have any optical instruments in the whole world that have that resolution. There are millions of viruses which exist. Everyone has millions of these in their body. One of the contentious issues over a virus is that unless it can be identified, the risk is that anything introduced to fight it, may kill the viruses that we depend on for our health.

I will say again. Look at a tiny pin head. Imagine 50,000 viruses (germs) sitting on that pin head side by side. That is how small a virus is. Now take an air molecule, which is a hundred times larger than a virus. If just ONE air molecule can get through a mask, in or out, and by breathing you intake thousand of molecules of air then you could be breathing in, hypothetically, thousands of viruses - which we do every second of our lives. Where is your argument against that?

The only way you can keep other people safe is by being 'healthy' your self and allowing your own body defences to fight any 'bad' viruses. That is how humans have managed to survive for many thousands of years.

It is only in comparatively recent years, that the number of diseases have been increasing. This could be for a number of reasons:

1. Easier interrnational travel.
2. People having greater interaction with animals
3. Medical interference against natural defences.
4. The world becoming more populated.
5. Far greater use of drugs and chemicals.

I really, REALLY would like to hear ANY argument you have against these facts. Until such statements are proved to be wrong - then you have to accept that they are correct. It is not that I am 'superior' in any way, heaven forbid - I am no different to anyone else, it is just that no-one has disproved anything I have said.

Sorry Prof your vain exercise in semantics has about as much validity as the rest of your ramblings;

"No one has seen the virus" is I presume an effort to ignore the microscopes that use imaging as below.

https://www.cdc.gov/sars/lab/images.html

Proof enough and also good enough to develop a vaccine.

I suppose you stick your fingers in your ears and sing la la la when you hear of these things.

Oh and just out of interest how do you know how big a virus is?

[said]

Sorry Prof your vain exercise in semantics has about as much validity as the rest of your ramblings;

"No one has seen the virus" is I presume an effort to ignore the microscopes that use imaging as below.

https://www.cdc.gov/sars/lab/images.html

Proof enough and also good enough to develop a vaccine.

I suppose you stick your fingers in your ears and sing la la la when you hear of these things.

Oh and just out of interest how do you know how big a virus is?

Contagious isn't it? It is far easier to join a mob than fight them. Ok! It would seem you know everything there is to know about viruses - the photographs shown have the dimensions of exosomes, just a
small point, so we will ignore that. - and obviously you have read what is contained in the vaccinations and are completely assured that is what was needed - so you are well competent to be rude to someone who lacks your level of expertise. Is that right?

You tell me that I don't know what I am talking about - then proceed to ask how I know how big a virus is? Well, obviously you would measure it with a theodolite, wouldn't you?

[said]

You missed covidiots, antimaskers & antivaxers who refuse to follow simple rules to protect the vulnerable.

Absolutely! How on earth did human kind survive without them for all those thousands of years?

[sandGroundZero]

Absolutely! How on earth did human kind survive without them for all those thousands of years?

"All’s for the best in this, the best of all possible worlds,” Dr. Pangloss, — sums up his philosophy perfectly.

[said]

Scanning and electron microscopes show viruses clearly. If you are talking about optical instruments alone, you're just being pedantic.

And not proving any point whatsoever.

Really? I did not know that. Was that how they managed to isolate the virus? How easy that must have been for the researchers - why have they taken so long?

If the Transmission electron microscope has now been developed to image active viruses it would be useful to know. An ES incorporates electrons as opposed to photons and has to be under vacuum conditions. So any living or active microbe becomes disassociated and dies. Images of atoms are said to exist using the Scanning Tunnelling microscope - but this only applies to metals.

Only the largest and most complex viruses can be seen under the light microscope at the highest resolution. Brittanica

[Desert Region]

The difficulty for our Cut and Paste Professor is finding a retraction someone else has written to post.

Yes, Said is about as much a Professor as Beaker from The Muppet Show is a scientist.

People on social media are often accused of making comments for the 'likes' but Said appears to litter this Q Forum, angling for 'dislikes'. Thus, it is perhaps counter-productive to challenge and dismiss its constant splurges. Nevertheless, it's often necessary to deliver the rebuttals, regardless of the state of Said's unarticulated emotional needs:

[local]

Contagious isn't it? It is far easier to join a mob than fight them. Ok! It would seem you know everything there is to know about viruses - the photographs shown have the dimensions of exosomes, just a
small point, so we will ignore that. - and obviously you have read what is contained in the vaccinations and are completely assured that is what was needed - so you are well competent to be rude to someone who lacks your level of expertise. Is that right?

You tell me that I don't know what I am talking about - then proceed to ask how I know how big a virus is? Well, obviously you would measure it with a theodolite, wouldn't you?

So you constantly tell us we don't prove you wrong yet when I clearly do you drift off the point to obfuscate and introduce token measuring instruments and vesicles in a vain attempt at sarcasm.


As vaccines efficacy has been proven by extensive peer reviewed studies around the world in company, education and government studies your conspiracy theories unravel.

Your fellow believers who are thankfully small in number worldwide must keep meeting then Darwinism can work its magic.




https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-56922517

[Desert Region]

So you constantly tell us we don't prove you wrong yet when I clearly do you drift off the point to obfuscate and introduce token measuring instruments and vesicles in a vain attempt at sarcasm.


As vaccines efficacy has been proven by extensive peer reviewed studies around the world in company, education and government studies your conspiracy theories unravel.

Your fellow believers who are thankfully small in number worldwide must keep meeting then Darwinism can work its magic.




https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-56922517

I'm also not reassured, persuaded or impressed by the Said account's endless efforts to downplay COVID...