|
-
Originally Posted by said
The vote for Labour has increased because so many Labour voters have moved into Southport from Liverpool. The number of Labour voters in Liverpool decreased substantially! The turn out was greatly decreased and Old Swan alone really took a hit on Labour. Ask any of the local people. The only way that Labour voters can be enticed into Southport is by cheap housing and cheap alcohol, before it was far too expensive in Southport. If the voters had any loyalty at all, they would never have left Liverpool. If Liverpool area council is undertaking the future planning of Southport so that Southport becomes like Liverpool - where will these voters move to then? Further into North Lancashire? That is Conservative held. Southport is a far better place under Conservative than Liverpool is under Labour - that is why the voters are moving out of Liverpool in the thousands. Hey, Don't kid yourself, Labour man!
Usual garbage, I would doubt very much that many if any, move home for political reasons, this so called golden age when Southport was run by Conservatives, I take it this was the days of the red and cream buses which were old and knackered, when the rates were kept low by simply not investing in the town, when the town was living on past history.
Just remember Southport has never been an industrial town, no large scale manufacturing, surprising for you possibly there are probably more businesses located close by on the various industrial estates than there ever were in your rose tinted “golden age”.
The world, this country, this town are not as they were 50/60 years ago, not every change is an improvement, but looking backwards doesn’t work, never has, never will.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 5 Likes, 0 Dislikes
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
-
Originally Posted by said
You either have an extremely short memory or you are not a local person. The local people are very concerned. None of these plans have been discussed with local people.
Tubbs is back! Are you local? This is a local shop for local people...
Only local people have eyes. Outsiders are immediately struck blind the second they cross Southport borders (which are in themselves an unknown to both outsiders and locals - where does Birkdale begin - THAT'S WHY IT'S CALLED BOUNDARY STREET YOU FOOL!), rendering them completely unable to ascertain which improvements and changes the town needs. If you've never gnashed your teeth and wailed over the closure of the sea bathing pool, been moved to sweet tears of joy remembering a 'Pony Express' burger, or mentioned that the Palace Hotel was built the wrong way round, your opinion is of no consequence.
Originally Posted by said
The only way that Labour voters can be enticed into Southport is by cheap housing and cheap alcohol, before it was far too expensive in Southport. If the voters had any loyalty at all, they would never have left Liverpool.
But...but...aren't all Labour voters middle class metropolitan elites? Surely they'd fit right in with the residents of the leafy, sumptuous avenues of Bold Street, Bath Street and Derby Road? Meld effortlessly with the champagne quaffing Sandgrounders in 'Spoons and The Foghorn. Obviously they can only dream of attaining the social standing of those locals displaying ritzy elegance as they drape languorously across the lawn seats of Lord Street, expensive Special Brew in hand as they regale blind visitors with tales of needing spare change for a hot Lapsang Souchong. But they can dream, right?
Where do you live, by the way?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
If the voters had any loyalty at all, they would never have left Liverpool. If Liverpool area council is undertaking the future planning of Southport so that Southport becomes like Liverpool - where....
Liverpool City Council has no say whatsoever in the planning of Southport, whether now or in the future.
You are probably getting confused (as indeed you are most of the time) with the Liverpool City Regional Authority, but this has no say in how or where residents may choose to live. Its mandate:
"The Liverpool City Regional Combined Authority's aim is to ensure that everyone benefits from the decisions it makes. It wants to create an environment which allows its economy to thrive for the good of everyone who lives and works in Liverpool City Region.
"It works together to make investments in areas that have a real impact on its communities, such as transport, employment, culture, digital and housing. By using its devolved powers it can make a real and meaningful difference to the lives of the people living and working in the area.
"The Combined Authority is led by Metro Mayor Steve Rotheram and brings together Liverpool City Region’s six local authorities – Halton, Knowsley, Liverpool, Sefton, St Helens and Wirral – to tackle the big issues that matter to all those in the area, together."
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by silver fox
Just remember Southport has never been an industrial town, no large scale manufacturing, surprising for you possibly there are probably more businesses located close by on the various industrial estates than there ever were in your rose tinted “golden age”.
To be strictly accurate, that is not correct. Up to around the 1970s Southport had a wide variety of industrial and manufacturing centres over the years.
These included the Vulcan Motor Works, which had plants in Yellow House Lane and Hawwside Street before its move to a brand new factory in Crossens (later acquired by Brockhouse Engineering and then followed by firms such as Philips, Mullard, Dorman Smith, ICT etc.
Others have included the White Hudson sweet manufacturers, Chewits, a glove factory, the Roddy (later Blubell) doll factory in Tulketh Street, Latimers Engineering and similar production centres around the town.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
have you ever worked on a fairground?
Good heavens, no. I've never been that desperate for work.
I do however recall you bragging about how your job at the fairground made you attractive to so many young women. This was some time before "me too" became a thing and boasting about being a sexual predator went out of fashion.
I take it you may have attended conferences with these chaps?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPv-Ftxvu6I
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by silver fox
Usual garbage, I would doubt very much that many if any, move home for political reasons, this so called golden age when Southport was run by Conservatives, I take it this was the days of the red and cream buses which were old and knackered, when the rates were kept low by simply not investing in the town, when the town was living on past history.
Just remember Southport has never been an industrial town, no large scale manufacturing, surprising for you possibly there are probably more businesses located close by on the various industrial estates than there ever were in your rose tinted “golden age”.
The world, this country, this town are not as they were 50/60 years ago, not every change is an improvement, but looking backwards doesn’t work, never has, never will.
Certainly true, Southport Corporation embedded decline by not investing, hell bent on chasing the lowest rates.
They did dodgy deal after dodgy deal to boot.
From Sand winning to golf course leases, planning deals the list is rather long.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by silver fox
Usual garbage, I would doubt very much that many if any, move home for political reasons, this so called golden age when Southport was run by Conservatives, I take it this was the days of the red and cream buses which were old and knackered, when the rates were kept low by simply not investing in the town, when the town was living on past history.
Just remember Southport has never been an industrial town, no large scale manufacturing, surprising for you possibly there are probably more businesses located close by on the various industrial estates than there ever were in your rose tinted “golden age”.
The world, this country, this town are not as they were 50/60 years ago, not every change is an improvement, but looking backwards doesn’t work, never has, never will.
Whose talking about the past? It is the future we have to look to. We have all witnessed what has happened in Liverpool under the same council officials - Liverpool One has had more businesses close down than opened, the promised number of jobs available never materialised - thirty years after Manchester revitalised, Liverpool tried to imitate it and it failed badly when it succumbed to extremely poor planning. So bad in fact, that a huge number of Liverpool people left the city.
It would appear that the same dated action is to be taken in Southport - dated, cheap attractions to keep the population quiet and mis-directed funding on unnecessary structures. Just who are they trying to attract into town? The big investors, the monied elite left the town years ago as it began to go down. We need to attract young business people, with vibrant ideas to protect the future of Southport. A few pubs with cheap beer and a Big Eye just will not do it!
I said when the huge housing projects began in Southport - with no jobs available for the people, and many on benefits, the town would become a hot bed of vandalism and crime. It so happened.
I said that when the council allowed a huge number of retirees from the South to settle in Southport, there would be little opportunity for new businesses and that the expense would hit our economy. It happened.
If you are happy to see the resort turned into a town of dereliction for the future - then obviously you are not going to be happy with revitalising it. Good news for you is that housing will become even cheaper, the few shops we have will close down, there will be no money for maintaining the town and it will become the a..s end of nowhere.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by local
Certainly true, Southport Corporation embedded decline by not investing, hell bent on chasing the lowest rates.
They did dodgy deal after dodgy deal to boot.
From Sand winning to golf course leases, planning deals the list is rather long.
Where is the evidence for that list? Most certainly the town management has become far worse now! ALL our amenities have been closed down, there is nothing left in Southport apart from cheap housing, scruffy parks and choked up roads.
Dodgy deals? I guess using taxpayer's money to build a new football stadium is a great idea? The fact that so many dodgy deals resulted in Liverpool gaining the worst reputation among global investors would not have helped the North west either.
Southport would much, much prefer to have a Southport Corporation now - at least they were all local people who stood up to scrutiny and never needed to form a brotherhood mafia to get things done their way.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by salus.populi
Good heavens, no. I've never been that desperate for work.
I do however recall you bragging about how your job at the fairground made you attractive to so many young women. This was some time before "me too" became a thing and boasting about being a sexual predator went out of fashion.
I take it you may have attended conferences with these chaps?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPv-Ftxvu6I
You really are unbelievable! I had no wish to work on farms during the summer holidays - so I worked on one of the biggest fairgrounds in the country for three years running, and enjoyed every minute of it.
To me, you have all had your heads stuck in the sand. I have never set out to gain personal gratification - I have always looked upon life as being fun. Don't you agree?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
I said that when the council allowed a huge number of retirees from the South to settle in Southport, there would be little opportunity for new businesses and that the expense would hit our economy.
Nobody needs council permission to retire anywhere.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by salus.populi
Nobody needs council permission to retire anywhere.
Prior to a few years ago - those who retired in Liverpool areas and were on benefits were not allowed to rent outside of the area where they lived. That changed under the Freedom of Movement legislation where they could choose to live wherever they wanted to. They chose Southport which was an error for two reasons - Many of those migrating still believed that Southport was a 'posh' place to live, so they chose to try to better themselves - but found they had missed the boat. Secondly, the different personalities between urban people and rural people do not amalgamate well.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
Prior to a few years ago - those who retired in Liverpool areas and were on benefits were not allowed to rent outside of the area where they lived. That changed under the Freedom of Movement legislation where they could choose to live wherever they wanted to. They chose Southport which was an error for two reasons - Many of those migrating still believed that Southport was a 'posh' place to live, so they chose to try to better themselves - but found they had missed the boat. Secondly, the different personalities between urban people and rural people do not amalgamate well.
Quality!
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
Prior to a few years ago - those who retired in Liverpool areas and were on benefits were not allowed to rent outside of the area where they lived. That changed under the Freedom of Movement legislation where they could choose to live wherever they wanted to. They chose Southport which was an error for two reasons - Many of those migrating still believed that Southport was a 'posh' place to live, so they chose to try to better themselves - but found they had missed the boat. Secondly, the different personalities between urban people and rural people do not amalgamate well.
So nobody receiving a state pension was allowed to leave Liverpool until "freedom of movement legislation" allowed them to do so? Can you explain exactly which legislation that was and when it came into force?
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by salus.populi
So nobody receiving a state pension was allowed to leave Liverpool until "freedom of movement legislation" allowed them to do so? Can you explain exactly which legislation that was and when it came into force?
I think that Said was actually being intentionally satirical.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Originally Posted by said
Dodgy deals? I guess using taxpayer's money to build a new football stadium is a great idea? The fact that so many dodgy deals resulted in Liverpool gaining the worst reputation among global investors would not have helped the North west either.
Complete and utter bollocks. It's costing Everton FC around £500m to build the new stadium, which will bring a fantastic boost to the entire area for both facilities and employment.
-
Member Post Likes / Dislikes - 0 Likes, 0 Dislikes
|
Search Qlocal (powered by google)
Privacy & Cookie Policy
Check Todays Deals On Amazon.co.uk
Check Todays Deals on Ebay.co.uk
Booking.com
Supporting Local Business
Be Seen - Advertise on Qlocal
UK, Local Online News Community, Forums, Chats, For Sale, Classified, Offers, Vouchers, Events, Motors Sale, Property For Sale Rent, Jobs, Hotels, Taxi, Restaurants, Pubs, Clubs, Pictures, Sports, Charities, Lost Found
UK,
UK News,
|