Coast Road Closure

[Stuartli]

If anyone has any views that do not agree with someone else's own - they are immediately labelled by the wokes - the people who cannot make an argument. The people who do not believe in free speech because they are unable to compete because they cannot argue.

It is easy to sleep at night if you have a clear conscience - why do you suffer from insomnia?

Nothing of the sort. It's The PNP's rather nasty view of other road users who use four wheel transport rather than two.

Time you woke up to the fact.

[justbecause]

Having been on here for donkeys years, though only admitting to joining relatively recently, you well know who we are.....why, Path'n'Pedal of course!

Fyi, the Police asked for a temporary 30mph limit along there last year, specifically because that stretch was seeing multiple accidents - do keep up!

Absolutely incorrect, the Police asked for a temporary reduction of the speed limit because of the dangerous state of the road surface. That stretch of road hasn’t seen multiple accidents, and the Police wanted it to stay that way.

[The PNP]

Absolutely incorrect, the Police asked for a temporary reduction of the speed limit because of the dangerous state of the road surface. That stretch of road hasn’t seen multiple accidents, and the Police wanted it to stay that way.

Who are you trying to kid - I've myself have seen it closed due smashes on more than one occasion - duh!

[Stuartli]

Who are you trying to kid - I've myself have seen it closed due smashes on more than one occasion - duh!

Perhaps if you bothered to check facts before posting, you might not look so behind the times?

https://tinyurl.com/2p8trx4b

[The PNP]

Perhaps if you bothered to check facts before posting, you might not look so behind the times?

https://tinyurl.com/2p8trx4b

Yes, we know why the (currently) 30mph limit was brought in at the behest of the Police. Namely that they were concerned about the uneven surface being unsuitable for higher speeds......But that doesn't in any way negate the fact that there have been smashes down there over the the years. I've even been turned back by Police there myself when on my bike, which I believe was because there was a deceased on the carriageway.

[justbecause]

Who are you trying to kid - I've myself have seen it closed due smashes on more than one occasion - duh!

“More than one occasion” doesn’t constitute multiple accidents. Do keep up.

[justbecause]

Yes, we know why the (currently) 30mph limit was brought in at the behest of the Police. Namely that they were concerned about the uneven surface being unsuitable for higher speeds......But that doesn't in any way negate the fact that there have been smashes down there over the the years. I've even been turned back by Police there myself when on my bike, which I believe was because there was a deceased on the carriageway.

Your post#43
Fyi, the Police asked for a temporary 30mph limit along there last year, specifically because that stretch was seeing multiple accidents - do keep up!

So now you’re freely admitting that your comment in #43 was not only incorrect, but totally false. How about retracting that comment, and admitting that you posted it because of your hatred for the motorist.
I won’t hold my breath though.

[The PNP]

Your post#43
Fyi, the Police asked for a temporary 30mph limit along there last year, specifically because that stretch was seeing multiple accidents - do keep up!

So now you’re freely admitting that your comment in #43 was not only incorrect, but totally false. How about retracting that comment, and admitting that you posted it because of your hatred for the motorist.
I won’t hold my breath though.

'Multiple' in the sense of more than one incident and not individual smashes involving several cars simultaneously....On the other point you are right, I should have added: '-and they don't want to see more of them, due to the state of the road'.

[justbecause]

[QUOTE=The PNP;6801138]'Multiple' in the sense of more than one incident and not individual smashes involving several cars simultaneously....On the other point you are right, I should have added: '-and they don't want to see more of them, due to the state of the road'. [/QUOTE

NO!! What you should have added was, I got that completely wrong, I shouldn’t have posted something that I knew to be completely inaccurate and false, simply to reiterate my ongoing hatred for anyone who dares to take to roads on more than two wheels.

[The PNP]

[QUOTE=justbecause;6801141]

'Multiple' in the sense of more than one incident and not individual smashes involving several cars simultaneously....On the other point you are right, I should have added: '-and they don't want to see more of them, due to the state of the road'. [/QUOTE

NO!! What you should have added was, I got that completely wrong, I shouldn’t have posted something that I knew to be completely inaccurate and false, simply to reiterate my ongoing hatred for anyone who dares to take to roads on more than two wheels.

Fact is, that road needs two things: 1) Closing periodically for repairs, because it regularly subsides due to being constructed on a bed of rubbish. 2) A lower limit, particularly in vicinity of its junction with Marshside Road/the pedestrian crossing.

[justbecause]

[QUOTE=The PNP;6801144]

Fact is, that road needs two things: 1) Closing periodically for repairs, because it regularly subsides due to being constructed on a bed of rubbish. 2) A lower limit, particularly in vicinity of its junction with Marshside Road/the pedestrian crossing.

That is NOT a retraction of your previous false statements.

[Kritou]

Who are you trying to kid - I've myself have seen it closed due smashes on more than one occasion - duh!

You might be fast on the draw but your aim needs working on - tryhttp://crashmap.co.uk and read the details for Marine Drive incidents …

[silver fox]

[QUOTE=The PNP;6801144]

Fact is, that road needs two things: 1) Closing periodically for repairs, because it regularly subsides due to being constructed on a bed of rubbish. 2) A lower limit, particularly in vicinity of its junction with Marshside Road/the pedestrian crossing.

Your opinion only and your opinion currently has the value of a chocolate teapot.

[silver fox]

Hi 'said'. As you can see, I've been keeping myself well entertained, winding up the the usual suspects, lol!

You claim to be winding up people, I see it rather differently, I see someone more than a little peeved when his pie in the sky dreams have hit the buffers, striking out blindly with lies and misinformation, presenting his own fixations and obsessions as some sort of fact, not surprised you have attracted the support of one of the ace conspiracy theorists on this forum.

You're in "good" company, remember anger is corrosive, doesn't do you any good.

[justbecause]

[QUOTE=silver fox;6801182]

Your opinion only and your opinion currently has the value of a chocolate teapot.

This was NOT posted by me.